Miller sixtyfour alcohol11/1/2022 River users on Australia day (a national public holiday) were significantly more likely to drink heavily (Mean BAC ≥0.05% = 0.175% SD ± 0.09). diving into water of unknown depth and jumping into the river from height). River users who recorded a BAC ≥0.050% were more likely to self-report engaging in risky activities (i.e. Those significantly more likely to record a BAC ≥0.050% at the river were: aged 18–34 years, resided in inner regional and low socio-economic areas, visited the river in the afternoon, with friends, on days with higher maximum air temperatures, frequent river users (11+ times in the last 30 days) and those who spend longer in the water (301+ minutes). Six hundred eighty four people participated (51.6% female 49.0% aged 18–34 years). Univariate and chi square analysis (95% confidence interval) was conducted. Hazardous lifetime drinking levels were calculated and their impact on drowning risk evaluated. BAC was examined by BAC reading (negative, positive, ≥0.050%). For BAC, participants were asked to record time since their last alcoholic drink and were then breathalysed to record an estimate of their BAC. The survey covered eight domains: demographics river attendance frequency frequency of engaging in water activities drinking patterns alcohol and water safety knowledge alcohol and water safety attitudes alcohol consumption and Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC). MethodsĪ convenience sample of adult (18+ years) river users were surveyed at four river locations. This study examines alcohol consumption patterns of river users and their attitudes to drowning risk. Little is known about people’s river usage, a leading drowning location.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |